|
Introduction
Using our field data and updated 2000 maps/shapefiles, we created a series
of spatial
models to produce useful information about the study area's inherent suitability
for agriculture, human settlement and preservation. The following sections
discuss the modeling process, including qualitative assumptions and quantitative
techniques necessary to achieve meaningful results.[Modeling
Tool] [Agriculture] [Human
Settlement] [Preservation] [Results]
[The Next Step]
Spatial Modeling as an Analysis Tool
A model is an abstract, simplified
interpretation of reality. It strives to imitate and predict how phenomena would occur,
or end results would appear, in actual life. Because "reality" is so complex and essentially
mysterious it cannot be perfectly imitated.
As in our case, we did not endeavor to include all possible influences
that would lead to the answer of a question like "where should human
settlement occur on this property". However
given the scope and time constraints of this project we included a selection of
data that was available and which we created.
For this selection we combined our firsthand knowledge about the area
with the knowledge we had gained from the resources we consulted and our
judgment as students of environmental planning. By
representing only those factors that are important to our study, a model creates
a simplified, manageable view of the real world.
A
GIS-Model is a collection of processes performed on spatial data that produces
information, usually in the form of a map.
One may use this map for education, decision making, scientific study, and to
provide general information. Each process in a model has three components: input
data, a function that transforms the input data or derives new information from
it, and the output data that the function creates. For this project,
input data was digitized from maps and collected in the field. ArcView's
ModelBuilder extension performed the transformation functions, and the output
data was created in shapefile format.
Spatial
models can do the following:
-
Rate
geographic areas according to a set of criteria. The type of spatial model
we have employed evaluates site suitability to various uses (agriculture,
human settlement, and preservation). To choose the most suitable land for
these various uses, you must decide how many factors you will consider and
which are most important. You might decide that water availability is the
most important factor, or proximity to infrastructure, or wildlife habitat
considerations.
-
Make
predictions about what occurs or will occur in geographic areas. To predict
which areas are most likely to be suitable for farming, you need to know
something about soil depth, organic content of the soil, and availability of
water for irrigation. By overlaying
the relevant the data sets in a model, for example, one can generate results in a map representing zones
with a range of suitability for agriculture.
A
more complex spatial model may combine quantitative information (for instance,
how far away is something or how much does it cost) with qualitative information
(for instance, how desirable is something or how important is it). We established inputs and values for each theme within
the model. See the specific model descriptions below to view the algorithm
used for each. The algorithm consists of input themes, percent influence,
input labels and scale values. The following definitions refer to all three
model algorithms depicted in table format below.
Input Theme |
Gridfiles derived from shapefiles. Gridfiles are
composed of pixels (square cells), to which one can assign different values
|
% Inf |
Percentage of input theme's influence within the model as
a whole. |
Input Field |
Identification number assigned to a given attribute.
The input field "NODATA" represents area outside of the study
area that is included because model builder can only analyze a perfect
square. In the case of Rancho San Eduardo, the study area is
somewhat diamond-shaped, but sits inside an imaginary square.
NODATA represents areas within the square but outside the diamond. |
Input Label |
Represents the particular attribute(s) taken from the
gridfile. The "Ranch" label represents area outside the
attribute being modeled, but inside the study area. Again, NODATA
represents area outside the entire ranch study area. |
Scale Value |
Numerical values given to certain ranges of each attribute
to denote the strength of suitability for that attribute or range
thereof. A value of zero is represented by the word
"restricted." |
The
Agricultural Suitability Model
Soil and water comprise the essential elements for agriculture in this climate,
and most of the attributes in the agricultural suitability model refer to these
elements. Minimum soil depth
is an obvious necessity for agriculture. However, not just any soil is ideally
suited for agriculture. The percent of organic matter in the soil, the ability of the soil to drain, and
the ability of the soil to release nutrients to a growing plant (cation exchange
capacity) were also taken into account. Staying
away from areas prone to erosion was also important and was represented in the
model.
Next,
access to water came into play. At
first we thought the mere proximity to a water source would be considered.
But then we realized that the capacity of the water delivery system
needed to be taken into consideration. Hence
a "sub-model" was created which assigned values to both the proximity
and the delivery capacity of the water source (depending on elevation) using
Boolean logic of if-then scenarios. For
example, if an area (grid cell) of land was at an elevation below a gravity flow
earthen acequia it was assigned a higher value than an area of land that had an
elevation higher than the same acequia. Each
delivery system was rated accordingly including acequias (both concrete and
earthen) center-pivot irrigation systems, wells, and a large water reservoir.
Slopes
were included in the model. Flat
slopes are more conducive to agriculture in an area that is periodically
affected by flash flooding and erosion, therefore steep slopes were given a low
value. So too were areas that would
be difficult to cultivate due to the vegetation already present. Here we were specifically thinking of several areas of heavy
mesquite which is famous for its difficulty of removal.
Finally
we considered the areas already developed with buildings as being unsuitable for
use as agriculture.
Refer to the model-building methodology
for a technical description of how this was accomplished using the ArcView ModelBuilder
extension and a flowchart depicting the algorithmic process used to convert
shapefiles into agricultural suitability results.
The
Human Settlement Suitability Model
In
considering what areas would be most suitable for human habitation (dwellings),
slopes and aspect (i.e., orientation to the sun) were important
considerations. While exotic forms
of architecture can be built on very steep slopes, we valued flatter terrain for
its more sustainable potential and to avoid the hazards of erosion that might
be caused by developing on the steeper areas.
Soil depth came into consideration here because of the engineering
involved in home construction, so deeper soil was given a higher value than
shallower soil. Also we wanted to preserve the areas of rocky outcrops, areas
with little or no soil, not only for the engineering problems they might pose,
but for their scenic beauty.
Avoiding the southern exposure was considered critical in this arid
climate where few tall trees are available for shading from harsh sun.
There
was discussion about how to evaluate the floodplain because of the nature and
location of the river terraces. The
field research revealed that the terraces had been flooded in recent time as
witnessed by extensive debris in these areas.
The 100-year floodplain map,
however, showed floodplains extending well beyond the terraces into areas
considerably higher in elevation. We
chose not to exclude these areas but assign them a suitability value one-half of that of the area
outside the floodplain. In
such situations in the United States,
a home owner would be obliged to purchase flood insurance.
Finally
somewhat like the agricultural model, proximity and elevation in relation to
water infrastructure were evaluated and valued.
Refer to the model-building methodology
for a technical description of how this was accomplished using the ArcView ModelBuilder
extension and a flowchart depicting the algorithmic process used to convert
shapefiles into human settlement suitability results.
The
Preservation Suitability
Model
Areas
were assigned high preservation value based on several factors, including the
extent of plant biodiversity. Higher
diversity, we deduced, equaled higher wildlife habitat.
Also since there was not much variability throughout the site, higher
plant diversity was valued for its uniqueness alone.
Livestock tanks and the one area of wetlands around the large water
reservoir were
also valued according to their ability to attract wild life and nurture water
loving herbaceous plants. Arroyos
were valued because of their generally larger percentage of vegetative cover and
ability to provide shady microclimate.
As
mentioned above, rocky outcrops were valued because of their beauty and the views
available on top of them.
Finally,
there were several cultural features that merited consideration for
preservation.
The ruins of an old house located in the southeast quadrant of the ranch property were
assigned special value, as was an area with a high concentration of Indian
arrowheads and flints.
Refer to the model-building methodology
for a technical description of how this was accomplished using the ArcView ModelBuilder
extension and a flowchart depicting the algorithmic process used to convert
shapefiles into preservation suitability results.
Results
Agricultural Suitability
Natural landscape features
used in the model included several soil-related factors, including soil depth,
soil cation exchange capacity, organic content, internal soil drainage, slope,
aspect (direction of slope), rocky outcrops, and highly erosive zones. Cultural
measures used in modeling suitability for agriculture included the ability to
provide pressurized water flow from the existing irrigation system and large
water tank. Numerical values
resulting from running the model yielded several categories of suitability,
ranging from Restricted Areas to Lowest
to Highest Suitability. The
areas in the vicinity of the existing irrigation systems scored the best in the
model. Water availability was the
most determining factor influencing the model results. Soil types were not
altogether very variable around the ranch.
|